Abstract
This article explores the first-hand experience of the diversity in styles of men’s
briefs. It questions the standard categorization of briefs based on coverage and leg
length. Due to the advent of internet-based sales channels, the scope for design
has widened dramatically. The quality and experience of underwear styles is not
captured in waistband dimensions and information on fabric. The article questions
some ideas about designers’ ability to communicate product understanding given
the tacit, non-verbal and haptic qualities inherent in briefs. It also raises questions about research paradigms common in industrial design research. This article
is thus both about the subject (men’s briefs) and the means of research (research
paradigm). The article combines aspects of design research used for industrial
design and approaches such as wardrobe studies and interpretation used in fashion
research.
briefs. It questions the standard categorization of briefs based on coverage and leg
length. Due to the advent of internet-based sales channels, the scope for design
has widened dramatically. The quality and experience of underwear styles is not
captured in waistband dimensions and information on fabric. The article questions
some ideas about designers’ ability to communicate product understanding given
the tacit, non-verbal and haptic qualities inherent in briefs. It also raises questions about research paradigms common in industrial design research. This article
is thus both about the subject (men’s briefs) and the means of research (research
paradigm). The article combines aspects of design research used for industrial
design and approaches such as wardrobe studies and interpretation used in fashion
research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | critical studies in men´s fashion |
Number of pages | 20 |
ISSN | 2050-0718 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 26 Oct 2023 |
Keywords
- Packaging
- semantics
- underwear
- sexuality
- masculinity
- research design
Artistic research
- No