Dissonant Nature

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

Nature restoration is far from being a neural undertaking. Just like any other type of heritage production it can be the source of dissonance – ‘our’ nature is not necessary ‘their’ nature. Often this dissonance is managed in ways, which are not particular sensitive to site-specificity. As exemplified by the Skjern River Restoration Project (1999-2003), one interpretation of the landscape sometimes suppresses other valid interpretations neglecting its diverse history. Landscape architecture might, however, provide an alternative approach to nature restoration that is more site specific and allows for multiple interpretations to coexist. Evidence can be found in the Re-naturalization of River Aire (2002-2015), a restoration project, which reveals approaches that could be labelled landscape architecture specific.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato24 sep. 2013
Antal sider14
StatusUdgivet - 24 sep. 2013
BegivenhedECLAS Conference 2013: Specifics - HafenCity Universität Hamburg, Hamborg, Tyskland
Varighed: 22 sep. 201325 sep. 2013

Konference

KonferenceECLAS Conference 2013: Specifics
LokationHafenCity Universität Hamburg
LandTyskland
ByHamborg
Periode22/09/201325/09/2013

Emneord

  • Naturgenopretning
  • Landskabsarkitektur
  • Transformation
  • Natursyn
  • Kulturarv

Kunstnerisk udviklingsvirksomhed (KUV)

  • Nej

Citer dette

Clemmensen, T. J. (2013). Dissonant Nature. Afhandling præsenteret på ECLAS Conference 2013: Specifics, Hamborg, Tyskland.
Clemmensen, Thomas Juel. / Dissonant Nature. Afhandling præsenteret på ECLAS Conference 2013: Specifics, Hamborg, Tyskland.14 s.
@conference{4333842f29324f008e30cf63309d1ecd,
title = "Dissonant Nature",
abstract = "Nature restoration is far from being a neural undertaking. Just like any other type of heritage production it can be the source of dissonance – ‘our’ nature is not necessary ‘their’ nature. Often this dissonance is managed in ways, which are not particular sensitive to site-specificity. As exemplified by the Skjern River Restoration Project (1999-2003), one interpretation of the landscape sometimes suppresses other valid interpretations neglecting its diverse history. Landscape architecture might, however, provide an alternative approach to nature restoration that is more site specific and allows for multiple interpretations to coexist. Evidence can be found in the Re-naturalization of River Aire (2002-2015), a restoration project, which reveals approaches that could be labelled landscape architecture specific.",
keywords = "Naturgenopretning, Landskabsarkitektur , Transformation, Natursyn, Kulturarv, Nature Restoration, Landscape Transformation, Dissonant Heritage, Landscape Architecture, Cultural heritage",
author = "Clemmensen, {Thomas Juel}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "24",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 22-09-2013 Through 25-09-2013",

}

Clemmensen, TJ 2013, 'Dissonant Nature', Paper fremlagt ved ECLAS Conference 2013: Specifics, Hamborg, Tyskland, 22/09/2013 - 25/09/2013.

Dissonant Nature. / Clemmensen, Thomas Juel.

2013. Afhandling præsenteret på ECLAS Conference 2013: Specifics, Hamborg, Tyskland.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Dissonant Nature

AU - Clemmensen, Thomas Juel

PY - 2013/9/24

Y1 - 2013/9/24

N2 - Nature restoration is far from being a neural undertaking. Just like any other type of heritage production it can be the source of dissonance – ‘our’ nature is not necessary ‘their’ nature. Often this dissonance is managed in ways, which are not particular sensitive to site-specificity. As exemplified by the Skjern River Restoration Project (1999-2003), one interpretation of the landscape sometimes suppresses other valid interpretations neglecting its diverse history. Landscape architecture might, however, provide an alternative approach to nature restoration that is more site specific and allows for multiple interpretations to coexist. Evidence can be found in the Re-naturalization of River Aire (2002-2015), a restoration project, which reveals approaches that could be labelled landscape architecture specific.

AB - Nature restoration is far from being a neural undertaking. Just like any other type of heritage production it can be the source of dissonance – ‘our’ nature is not necessary ‘their’ nature. Often this dissonance is managed in ways, which are not particular sensitive to site-specificity. As exemplified by the Skjern River Restoration Project (1999-2003), one interpretation of the landscape sometimes suppresses other valid interpretations neglecting its diverse history. Landscape architecture might, however, provide an alternative approach to nature restoration that is more site specific and allows for multiple interpretations to coexist. Evidence can be found in the Re-naturalization of River Aire (2002-2015), a restoration project, which reveals approaches that could be labelled landscape architecture specific.

KW - Naturgenopretning

KW - Landskabsarkitektur

KW - Transformation

KW - Natursyn

KW - Kulturarv

KW - Nature Restoration

KW - Landscape Transformation

KW - Dissonant Heritage

KW - Landscape Architecture

KW - Cultural heritage

M3 - Paper

ER -

Clemmensen TJ. Dissonant Nature. 2013. Afhandling præsenteret på ECLAS Conference 2013: Specifics, Hamborg, Tyskland.