Uncovering the genomic and metagenomic research potential in old ethanol-preserved snakes

Claus M. Zacho, Martina A. Bager, Ashot Margaryan, Peter Gravlund, Anders Galatius, Arne Redsted Rasmussen, Morten Allentoft

Publications: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Natural history museum collections worldwide represent a tremendous resource of information on past and present biodiversity. Fish, reptiles, amphibians and many invertebrate collections have often been preserved in ethanol for decades or centuries and our knowledge on the genomic and metagenomic research potential of such material is limited. Here, we use ancient DNA protocols, combined with shotgun sequencing to test the molecular preservation in liver, skin and bone tissue from five old (1842 to 1964) museum specimens of the common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis). When mapping reads to a T. sirtalis reference genome, we find that the DNA molecules are highly damaged with short average sequence lengths (38–64 bp) and high C-T deamination, ranging from 9% to 21% at the first position. Despite this, the samples displayed relatively high endogenous DNA content, ranging from 26% to 56%, revealing that genome-scale analyses are indeed possible from all specimens and tissues included here. Of the three tested types of tissue, bone shows marginally but
significantly higher DNA quality in these metrics. Though at least one of the snakes had been exposed to formalin, neither the concentration nor the quality of the obtained DNA was affected. Lastly, we demonstrate that these specimens display a diverse and tissue-specific microbial genetic profile, thus offering authentic metagenomic data despite being submerged in ethanol for many years. Our results emphasize that historical museum collections continue to offer an invaluable source of information in the era of genomics.
Original languageEnglish
JournalP L o S One
Volume16/8
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
ISSN1932-6203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Aug 2021

Artistic research

  • No

Cite this