Foregrounding Learning in Infrastructuring: to Change Worldviews and Practices in the Public Sector

Mette Agger Eriksen, Per-Anders Hillgren, Anna Seravalli

Publications: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

154 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Mutual learning and infrastructuring are two core concepts in Participatory Design (PD), but the relation between them has yet to be explored. In this article, we foreground learning in infrastructuring processes aimed at change in the public sector. Star and Ruhleder’s (1996) framework for first, second, and third level issues is applied as a fruitful way to stage and analyze learning in such processes. The argument is developed through the insights that arose from a 4-year-long infrastructuring process about future library practices. Framed as Co-Labs this process was organized by researchers and officers from the local regional office. This led to adjusted roles for both PD researchers and civil servants working with materials at the operational and strategic levels. The case shows how learning led to profound changes in the regional public sector in the form of less bureaucratic and more participatory experimental and learning-focused worldviews and practices.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1 : Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1
EditorsChiara Del Gaudio, Leonardo Parra-Agudelo, Rachel Clarke, Joanna Saad-Sulonen, Andrea Botero, Felipe César Londono, Paula Escandón
Number of pages11
Volume1
Place of PublicationManizales, Colombia
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Publication date2020
EditionPDC '20
Pages182–192
Chapter(Re)Framing
ISBN (Print)9781450377003
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
SeriesProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference
VolumeVolume 1
ISSN2150-5896

Keywords

  • Co-Labs
  • public sector
  • new worldviews and practices
  • mutual learning
  • learning
  • future library practices case
  • Infrastructuring

Artistic research

  • No

Cite this