Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the relation between building conservation and circular economy (CE), which are often erroneously seen as inherently contradictory to one another.
Design/methodology/approach
The work draws from a comparative approach. The paper reviews a body of literature on architectural conservation and CE to establish an understanding on the state-of-the-art for both disciplines separately. Then, the relation between thereof is developed through a theoretical discourse.
Findings
Both architectural conservation and CE aim at safeguarding value, although they define “value” differently. Fabric-focused conservation and CE favor minimal intervention to material, albeit they arrive at this conclusion from different bases. Consequently, both approaches struggle with the low cost of virgin resource extraction and waste production and the high cost of human labor in contemporary Western societies. CE could be harnessed for building conservation by adopting its vocabulary and methodology, such as lifecycle assessment and material flow analysis. Transitioning toward CE can help increase the preservation of built heritage while redefining what is meant by “heritage” and “waste.”
Originality/value
Prior to this paper, there have been no articles addressing the relationship of the
concepts explicitly and to this extent. The paper provides a theoretical basis for further discourse and outlines some implications of CE for the construction and built heritage disciplines.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the relation between building conservation and circular economy (CE), which are often erroneously seen as inherently contradictory to one another.
Design/methodology/approach
The work draws from a comparative approach. The paper reviews a body of literature on architectural conservation and CE to establish an understanding on the state-of-the-art for both disciplines separately. Then, the relation between thereof is developed through a theoretical discourse.
Findings
Both architectural conservation and CE aim at safeguarding value, although they define “value” differently. Fabric-focused conservation and CE favor minimal intervention to material, albeit they arrive at this conclusion from different bases. Consequently, both approaches struggle with the low cost of virgin resource extraction and waste production and the high cost of human labor in contemporary Western societies. CE could be harnessed for building conservation by adopting its vocabulary and methodology, such as lifecycle assessment and material flow analysis. Transitioning toward CE can help increase the preservation of built heritage while redefining what is meant by “heritage” and “waste.”
Originality/value
Prior to this paper, there have been no articles addressing the relationship of the
concepts explicitly and to this extent. The paper provides a theoretical basis for further discourse and outlines some implications of CE for the construction and built heritage disciplines.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 29-40 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISSN | 2044-1266 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Nov 2019 |
Keywords
- conservation theory and practice
- sustainability
- architecture
- building materials
- modern heritage
Artistic research
- No
-
Reusing concrete panels from the industrial mass housing of the 1960s
Vestergaard, I., 25 Nov 2022, SBEfin2022 Emerging Concepts for Sustainable Built Environment (SBEfin2022). IOP Publishing, 8 p. (IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science , Vol. 1122).Publications: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Open Access -
Resource strategies: discussions on remodeling modernistic housing and related social impacts
Vestergaard, I., Moseng, K. & Geert Jensen, B., 2019. 10 p.Publications: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research › peer-review
Open Access13 Downloads (Pure) -
Resource strategies: discussions on remodeling modernistic housing and related social impacts
Vestergaard, I., Moseng, K. & Geert Jensen, B., 2018, p. 1. 1 p.Publications: Contribution to conference › Conference abstract for conference › Research › peer-review
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver