The Management of Dissonance in Nature Restoration

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Nature restoration is far from a neural undertaking. Just like any other type of heritage production, it can be the source of dissonance—‘our’ nature is not necessary ‘their’ nature. Often this dissonance is managed in ways, which are not particularly sensitive to site-specificity. As exemplified by the Skjern River Restoration Project (1999-2003), one interpretation of the landscape sometimes suppresses other valid interpretations, neglecting its diverse history. Landscape architecture might, however, provide an alternative approach to nature restoration that is more site-specific, allowing for multiple interpretations to coexist. Indications can be found in the Re-naturalization of River Aire (2002-2015)—a restoration project, which reveals approaches that could be labelled landscape architecture specific.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Landscape Architecture
Vol/bindtheme issue
Udgave nummer2-2014
Sider (fra-til)58-67
Antal sider10
ISSN1862-6033
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2014

Emneord

  • Naturgenopretning
  • Kulturarv
  • Kulturlandskab
  • Landskabsarkitektur
  • Transformation
  • Dissonans

Kunstnerisk udviklingsvirksomhed (KUV)

  • Nej

Citer dette

@article{b4300fbc8d2d4a29b8d7b8e8f9e83697,
title = "The Management of Dissonance in Nature Restoration",
abstract = "Nature restoration is far from a neural undertaking. Just like any other type of heritage production, it can be the source of dissonance—‘our’ nature is not necessary ‘their’ nature. Often this dissonance is managed in ways, which are not particularly sensitive to site-specificity. As exemplified by the Skjern River Restoration Project (1999-2003), one interpretation of the landscape sometimes suppresses other valid interpretations, neglecting its diverse history. Landscape architecture might, however, provide an alternative approach to nature restoration that is more site-specific, allowing for multiple interpretations to coexist. Indications can be found in the Re-naturalization of River Aire (2002-2015)—a restoration project, which reveals approaches that could be labelled landscape architecture specific.",
keywords = "Naturgenopretning, Kulturarv, Kulturlandskab, Landskabsarkitektur , Transformation, Dissonans",
author = "Clemmensen, {Thomas Juel}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/18626033.2014.931707",
language = "English",
volume = "theme issue",
pages = "58--67",
journal = "Journal of Landscape Architecture",
issn = "1862-6033",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2-2014",

}

The Management of Dissonance in Nature Restoration. / Clemmensen, Thomas Juel.

I: Journal of Landscape Architecture, Bind theme issue, Nr. 2-2014, 2014, s. 58-67.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Management of Dissonance in Nature Restoration

AU - Clemmensen, Thomas Juel

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Nature restoration is far from a neural undertaking. Just like any other type of heritage production, it can be the source of dissonance—‘our’ nature is not necessary ‘their’ nature. Often this dissonance is managed in ways, which are not particularly sensitive to site-specificity. As exemplified by the Skjern River Restoration Project (1999-2003), one interpretation of the landscape sometimes suppresses other valid interpretations, neglecting its diverse history. Landscape architecture might, however, provide an alternative approach to nature restoration that is more site-specific, allowing for multiple interpretations to coexist. Indications can be found in the Re-naturalization of River Aire (2002-2015)—a restoration project, which reveals approaches that could be labelled landscape architecture specific.

AB - Nature restoration is far from a neural undertaking. Just like any other type of heritage production, it can be the source of dissonance—‘our’ nature is not necessary ‘their’ nature. Often this dissonance is managed in ways, which are not particularly sensitive to site-specificity. As exemplified by the Skjern River Restoration Project (1999-2003), one interpretation of the landscape sometimes suppresses other valid interpretations, neglecting its diverse history. Landscape architecture might, however, provide an alternative approach to nature restoration that is more site-specific, allowing for multiple interpretations to coexist. Indications can be found in the Re-naturalization of River Aire (2002-2015)—a restoration project, which reveals approaches that could be labelled landscape architecture specific.

KW - Naturgenopretning

KW - Kulturarv

KW - Kulturlandskab

KW - Landskabsarkitektur

KW - Transformation

KW - Dissonans

U2 - 10.1080/18626033.2014.931707

DO - 10.1080/18626033.2014.931707

M3 - Journal article

VL - theme issue

SP - 58

EP - 67

JO - Journal of Landscape Architecture

JF - Journal of Landscape Architecture

SN - 1862-6033

IS - 2-2014

ER -