Geometrías fresadas

Dibujando para la manufactura usando el dibujo y el proceso

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

Why is there such disconnect between the visual mechanics of computational representation and the articulation of the same geometry via physical manufacturing?

Why do so many spend so much time trying to erase the marks of physical manufacturing (‘we must physically smooth this surface down, down, down to perfection’) instead of aligning these marks to the very process through which the original computational representation was born?

What if the virtual representations of computational geometry were treated as instruction towards physical manufacturing? What if we extract and employ these ‘virtual articulators’ as a critical part of the manufacturing process, linking virtual representation with physical production?

Why don’t we DRAW the manufacturing process so that our products WEAR their process?
OriginalsprogSpansk
Publikationsdato1 sep. 2016
Antal sider4
StatusUdgivet - 1 sep. 2016
BegivenhedSeminario Internatcional De Arquitectura 2016: The Digital Reveal - Universidad Piloto de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia
Varighed: 1 sep. 20162 sep. 2016

Seminar

SeminarSeminario Internatcional De Arquitectura 2016
LokationUniversidad Piloto de Colombia
LandColombia
ByBogota
Periode01/09/201602/09/2016

Kunstnerisk udviklingsvirksomhed (KUV)

  • Nej

Citer dette

Trempe Jr., R. B. (2016). Geometrías fresadas: Dibujando para la manufactura usando el dibujo y el proceso. Afhandling præsenteret på Seminario Internatcional De Arquitectura 2016, Bogota, Colombia.
Trempe Jr., Robert B. / Geometrías fresadas : Dibujando para la manufactura usando el dibujo y el proceso. Afhandling præsenteret på Seminario Internatcional De Arquitectura 2016, Bogota, Colombia.4 s.
@conference{1ab356edd0ab4b43a0bdef3181f54323,
title = "Geometr{\'i}as fresadas: Dibujando para la manufactura usando el dibujo y el proceso",
abstract = "Why is there such disconnect between the visual mechanics of computational representation and the articulation of the same geometry via physical manufacturing?Why do so many spend so much time trying to erase the marks of physical manufacturing (‘we must physically smooth this surface down, down, down to perfection’) instead of aligning these marks to the very process through which the original computational representation was born? What if the virtual representations of computational geometry were treated as instruction towards physical manufacturing? What if we extract and employ these ‘virtual articulators’ as a critical part of the manufacturing process, linking virtual representation with physical production? Why don’t we DRAW the manufacturing process so that our products WEAR their process?",
keywords = "CNC, NURBS, representation, manufacturing",
author = "{Trempe Jr.}, {Robert B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "Spansk",
note = "null ; Conference date: 01-09-2016 Through 02-09-2016",

}

Trempe Jr., RB 2016, 'Geometrías fresadas: Dibujando para la manufactura usando el dibujo y el proceso' Paper fremlagt ved Seminario Internatcional De Arquitectura 2016, Bogota, Colombia, 01/09/2016 - 02/09/2016, .

Geometrías fresadas : Dibujando para la manufactura usando el dibujo y el proceso. / Trempe Jr., Robert B.

2016. Afhandling præsenteret på Seminario Internatcional De Arquitectura 2016, Bogota, Colombia.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Geometrías fresadas

T2 - Dibujando para la manufactura usando el dibujo y el proceso

AU - Trempe Jr., Robert B.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Why is there such disconnect between the visual mechanics of computational representation and the articulation of the same geometry via physical manufacturing?Why do so many spend so much time trying to erase the marks of physical manufacturing (‘we must physically smooth this surface down, down, down to perfection’) instead of aligning these marks to the very process through which the original computational representation was born? What if the virtual representations of computational geometry were treated as instruction towards physical manufacturing? What if we extract and employ these ‘virtual articulators’ as a critical part of the manufacturing process, linking virtual representation with physical production? Why don’t we DRAW the manufacturing process so that our products WEAR their process?

AB - Why is there such disconnect between the visual mechanics of computational representation and the articulation of the same geometry via physical manufacturing?Why do so many spend so much time trying to erase the marks of physical manufacturing (‘we must physically smooth this surface down, down, down to perfection’) instead of aligning these marks to the very process through which the original computational representation was born? What if the virtual representations of computational geometry were treated as instruction towards physical manufacturing? What if we extract and employ these ‘virtual articulators’ as a critical part of the manufacturing process, linking virtual representation with physical production? Why don’t we DRAW the manufacturing process so that our products WEAR their process?

KW - CNC

KW - NURBS

KW - representation

KW - manufacturing

M3 - Paper

ER -

Trempe Jr. RB. Geometrías fresadas: Dibujando para la manufactura usando el dibujo y el proceso. 2016. Afhandling præsenteret på Seminario Internatcional De Arquitectura 2016, Bogota, Colombia.